The main scope of the paper is to review the construction method of (multi-)regional input–output tables (RIOTs) in the Czech Republic at the NUTS 3 regional level. We compare the estimation of regional IO tables based on a modified cross-hauling adjusted regionalisation method (CHARM) applied by the authors with application of the hybrid approach of (Sixta and Vltavská in Stat Stat Econ J 97:4–14, 2017) from the Department of Statistics at the University of Economics in Prague. The aim of the presented paper is to contribute to the discussion about the suitability of alternative methodological approaches from the perspective of quality and time. We assume that despite the lack of official, published RIOTs by state statistical offices, the existing methodology of the relatively simpler non-survey CHARM method represents an adequate option for the generation of regional input–output tables suitable for further analytical research.

本文的主要范围是在NUTS 3区域级别审查捷克共和国（多）区域投入产出表（RIOT）的构建方法。我们比较了作者根据修正的交叉牵引调整区域化方法（CHARM）与（Statix Stat Econ J 97：4–14，2017）中的（Sixta和Vltavská）混合方法的应用对区域IO表的估计。布拉格经济大学统计系。本文的目的是从质量和时间的角度促进有关替代方法论方法的适用性的讨论。我们假设尽管国家统计局缺乏官方的公开RIOT，