Due to increasing recognition of the collateral consequences associated with monetary sanctions, fees have begun to occupy a prominent place in critical debates. This is especially true for community corrections, where multiple fees are assessed and collected. However, the agency-level perspective has largely been omitted, especially regarding how the current landscape may facilitate—or impede—reform. Using self-report data from a state-wide sample of Chiefs of Probation and Parole, this paper provides a new perspective on the complex interplay between the policy and practices surrounding monetary sanctions. Responses suggest that the practices and philosophies surrounding the collection of fees vary significantly between jurisdictions. This obligation is also reported to challenge the traditional roles of probation officers by limiting discretion and complicating the existing tensions between their treatment and control-oriented responsibilities. Some respondents indicated meaningful reliance on fee revenue for operational and treatment budgets. Implications for policy reform, especially considering the variation observed in this single state, are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

机构层面对货币制裁的看法：当前形势和改革障碍

由于越来越多地认识到与货币制裁相关的附带后果，费用已开始在批判性辩论中占据重要位置。对于社区矫正来说尤其如此，因为社区矫正需要评估和收取多种费用。然而，机构层面的观点在很大程度上被忽略了，特别是关于当前形势如何促进或阻碍改革的问题。本文使用来自全州缓刑和假释首长样本的自我报告数据，为围绕货币制裁的政策和实践之间复杂的相互作用提供了新的视角。回应表明，围绕收费的做法和理念在不同司法管辖区之间存在显着差异。据报道，这项义务还通过限制自由裁量权并使他们的待遇与以控制为导向的责任之间的现有紧张关系复杂化来挑战缓刑官员的传统角色。一些受访者表示，运营和治疗预算明显依赖于费用收入。讨论了政策改革的影响，特别是考虑到在这个单一状态下观察到的变化。