Our interest in the Nuremberg trials never seems to cease. But have we been looking at the right questions? The Nuremberg moment and the quest for international justice for the atrocities carried out by the Germans during WW2 has largely been defined through an Anglo-American lens. In total there were 13 trials carried out in the period 1945–1949. The trials provided a legal framework for the development of the so-called Nuremberg principles, which means accountability for international crimes. The evolution and application of the legal principles pertaining to the punishment of genocide, for example, continue to resonate. The 2010 European Court of Human Rights case of Kononov v Latvia [2010] ECHR 667, for example, showed what was at stake with respect to the legitimacy of the Nuremberg principles, in its application to the Allies (Mälksoo, 2011).

中文翻译：

---

书评：在纽伦堡的苏联审判：第二次世界大战后国际军事法庭的新历史

我们对纽伦堡审判的兴趣似乎从未停止。但是，我们是否一直在寻找正确的问题？纽伦堡时刻和第二次世界大战期间德国人对暴行的国际正义追求很大程度上是通过英美两国的视角来界定的。在1945年至1949年期间，总共进行了13次审判。这些审判为发展所谓的纽伦堡原则提供了法律框架，这意味着对国际犯罪负有责任。例如，关于灭绝种族罪的法律原则的发展和应用继续引起共鸣。2010年欧洲人权法院Kononov诉拉脱维亚案 [2010]例如，ECHR 667展示了纽伦堡原则在适用于同盟国方面的正当性（Mälksoo，2011）。