ABSTRACT

Recent research has shown how identities are affected by, and resistant to, reflected appraisals, or how individuals perceive others view them. Despite renewed interest in criminal identity negotiation, the implications that the sanctioning context has for affecting the identity verification process of offenders has been underresearched. Using a sample of 498 restorative justice and 475 court participants in the Australian Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE), we discover that the effect of discrepancies between reflected appraisals and offender self-views on emotions and projected conformity vary by conference and court processing. These findings suggest that identity processes need to be considered when examining how offenders are sanctioned.

摘要

最近的研究表明，身份如何受到反映评估的影响和抵制，或者个人如何看待他人对他们的看法。尽管人们对犯罪身份谈判重新产生了兴趣，但制裁背景对影响罪犯身份验证过程的影响却没有得到充分研究。使用澳大利亚重新整合羞辱实验 (RISE) 中 498 名恢复性司法和 475 名法庭参与者的样本，我们发现反映的评估和犯罪者自我观点之间的差异对情绪和预期从众的影响因会议和法庭处理而异。这些发现表明，在检查如何制裁罪犯时，需要考虑身份过程。