Public‐sector mental health systems have set forth specialized practice competencies for forensic mental health clinicians conducting court‐ordered examinations. This study examined a sample of feedback letters to clinicians who submitted mid‐training and final reports for review as part of the requirements for certification as a juvenile court clinician. The most common feedback points were insufficient/irrelevant historical data, problems with clarity/organization of the report, problems with interview/mental status examination, and problems with competency to stand trial data/opinions. Clinicians had fewer deficiencies in their final report compared to their mid‐training report, supporting the perspective that forensic training and supervision is associated with better quality reports.

中文翻译：

---

少年法院诊所认证计划中对法医心理健康评估的反馈

公共部门的精神卫生系统为法医精神卫生临床医生规定了法院命令的检查规定了专门的实践能力。这项研究检查了给临床医生的反馈信样本，这些临床医生提交了中期培训和最终报告以供审查，这是获得少年法院临床医生认证要求的一部分。最常见的反馈点是：历史数据不足/不相关，报告的清晰度/组织性不佳，面试/心理状态检查存在问题，以及支持审判数据/意见的能力存在问题。与最终培训报告相比，临床医生在最终报告中的缺陷更少，这支持了法医培训和监督与更高质量报告相关的观点。