Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ), an approach to the assessment of open-ended problems which utilizes a series of comparisons to produce a standardized score, rank order, and a variety of other statistical measures, has demonstrated high levels of reliability and validity and the potential for application in a wide variety of areas. Further, research into using ACJ, both as a formative and summative assessment tool, has been conducted in multiple contexts across higher education. This systematized review of ACJ research outlines our approach to identifying, classifying, and organizing findings from research with ACJ in higher education settings as well as overarching themes and questions that remain. The intent of this work is to provide readers with an understanding of the current state of the field and several areas of potential further inquiry related to ACJ in higher education.

自适应比较判断（ACJ）是一种评估开放式问题的方法，该方法利用一系列比较来产生标准化的分数，等级顺序和各种其他统计量度，已经证明了高水平的可靠性和有效性，并且具有广泛的应用潜力。此外，在整个高等教育的多种情况下，都进行了将ACJ用作形成性和总结性评估工具的研究。对ACJ研究的系统化回顾概述了我们用于识别，分类和组织来自ACJ在高等教育环境中的研究结果以及总体主题和问题的方法。