Too frequently, representations of disciplinary writing foreground static notions of knowledge creation and literate practice in science and engineering. Rooted in discourse community theory, such representations present normative tropes of scientific practice that background notions of disciplinarity and obscure people’s lived experience and practice. Drawing on a case study of one woman, a civil and environmental engineer, this article argues for a lifeworld perspective of disciplinary becoming: a perspective that foregrounds notions of disciplinarity, lived experience, and literate practices as constantly mobile and in flux. The study suggests, specifically, that the woman’s work as an engineer cannot be separated from the people with whom she works, or has worked, and that her development as a writer extends beyond typical accounts of disciplinary enculturation. The author concludes by offering implications of this research for studies of disciplinarity and school science.

中文翻译：

---

生命世界视角下的土木与环境工程学的学科性和文化活动

学科写作的表现常常是在科学和工程领域中知识创造和文学实践的静态静态观念。这种表述植根于话语社区理论，呈现出科学实践的规范性取向，即学科性的背景概念掩盖了人们的生活经验和实践。本文以一名土木与环境工程师女性的案例研究为基础，提出了纪律化的生活世界观点：这种观点以纪律性，生活经验和文化实践为主题，并不断变化和变化。这项研究特别指出，女性作为工程师的工作不能与与之工作或一起工作的人分开，她作为作家的发展超出了典型的学科培养。最后，作者通过提供本研究对学科和学校科学的启示。