This study aims to explore the process of reading during writing. More specifically, it investigates whether a combination of keystroke logging data and eye tracking data yields a better understanding of cognitive processes underlying fluent and nonfluent text production. First, a technical procedure describes how writing process data from the keystroke logging program Inputlog are merged with reading process data from the Tobii TX300 eye tracker. Next, a theoretical schema on reading during writing is presented, which served as a basis for the observation context we created for our experiment. This schema was tested by observing 24 university students in professional communication (skilled writers) who typed short sentences that were manipulated to elicit fluent or nonfluent writing. The experimental sentences were organized into four different conditions, aiming at (a) fluent writing, (b) reflection about correct spelling of homophone verbs, (c) local revision, and (d) global revision. Results showed that it is possible to manipulate degrees of nonfluent writing in terms of time on task and percentage of nonfluent key transitions. However, reading behavior was affected only for the conditions that explicitly required revision. This suggests that nonfluent writing does not always affect the reading behavior, supporting the parallel and cascading processing hypothesis.

中文翻译：

---

使用眼动追踪和击键记录功能探索书写过程中的阅读过程

本研究旨在探讨写作过程中的阅读过程。更具体地说，它研究了击键记录数据和眼睛跟踪数据的组合是否可以更好地理解流利和非流利的文本产生的认知过程。首先，一个技术过程描述了如何将来自击键记录程序Inputlog的写入过程数据与来自Tobii TX300眼动仪的读取过程数据合并。接下来，提出了一种在写作过程中阅读的理论模式，这是我们为实验创建的观察上下文的基础。通过观察24位专业交流中的大学生（熟练的作家）测试了这种模式，这些大学生键入了简短的句子，这些句子被操纵来激发流利或流利的写作。实验句子分为四个不同的条件，旨在（a）流利的写作，（b）对同音动词正确拼写的反思，（c）局部修订和（d）整体修订。结果表明，可以根据任务的时间和非熟练键转换的百分比来控制非熟练书写的程度。但是，阅读行为仅在明确需要修订的条件下受到影响。这表明非流利的写作并不总是会影响阅读行为，支持并行和级联的处理假设。结果表明，可以根据任务的时间和非熟练键转换的百分比来控制非熟练书写的程度。但是，阅读行为仅在明确需要修订的条件下受到影响。这表明非流利的写作并不总是会影响阅读行为，支持并行和级联的处理假设。结果表明，可以根据任务的时间和非熟练键转换的百分比来控制非熟练书写的程度。但是，仅在明确需要修改的条件下，阅读行为才会受到影响。这表明非流利的写作并不总是会影响阅读行为，支持并行和级联的处理假设。