当前位置: X-MOL 学术Work and Occupations › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Moving From Adoption to Use: Physicians’ Mixed Commitments in Deciding to Use Robotic Technologies
Work and Occupations ( IF 4.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-11 , DOI: 10.1177/0730888420919792
Daniel A. Menchik 1
Affiliation  

This article shifts sociological attention from doctors' adoption of medical innovations to ask how doctors decide to use expensive technologies adopted by administrators. It draws upon a content analysis of clinical research and 25 interviews with cardiologists who must decide whether to use a computer mouse- and algorithm-driven technology and whose status is partially based on manual dexterity – “good hands”. The content analysis shows that researchers do not study topics that reflect the occupation's interest in the technology's capability to strengthen the occupation's standing in competing with other professions for a jurisdiction. The interviews show that the physicians made decisions based on the habits and routines they developed in their training venue, and their subsequent division of labor with colleagues in their current workplace venue. A typology of decision processes is proposed, suggesting the usefulness of capturing foreground preoccupations and the background conditions affecting the physicians' situations.

中文翻译:

从采用到使用:医生在决定使用机器人技术方面的不同承诺

本文将社会学关注从医生采用医疗创新转移到询问医生如何决定使用管理员采用的昂贵技术。它基于对临床研究的内容分析和对心脏病专家的 25 次采访,他们必须决定是否使用计算机鼠标和算法驱动的技术,并且其状态部分取决于手的灵活性——“好手”。内容分析表明,研究人员没有研究反映职业对技术能力的兴趣的主题,以加强职业在与其他职业竞争司法管辖区的地位。采访显示,医生根据他们在培训场所养成的习惯和惯例做出决定,以及他们随后在当前工作场所与同事的分工。提出了决策过程的类型学,表明捕获前景关注和影响医生情况的背景条件的有用性。
更新日期:2020-05-11
down
wechat
bug