当前位置: X-MOL 学术Research Evaluation › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective
Research Evaluation ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2017-12-21 , DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvx041
Carla Mara Hilário 1 , Daniel Martínez-Ávila 1 , Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio 1 , Dietmar Wolfram 2
Affiliation  

This article aims to contribute to the discussion on authorship in contemporary science from Foucauldian and Kuhnian perspectives, highlighting the social aspects of science and the role of authorship in scientific revolutions. Thus, it describes the functions of the ‘author’ discussed by Foucault that can assist to reveal the characteristics of the scientific practice and examples of how theories are materialized. As a result, it identifies the ways in which modern science is developed and how knowledge is construed by multiple authors, group authors, the merit that is attributed by citations, etc. This article highlights the complexity of authorship attribution and the need to rethink generalized bibliometric techniques to evaluate science considering other aspects that go beyond the mere listing of the authors.

中文翻译:

科学著作权:从福柯主义角度的批判性分析

本文旨在从福柯尔和库恩主义的角度为当代科学著作权的讨论做出贡献,强调科学的社会方面以及著作权在科学革命中的作用。因此,它描述了福柯所讨论的“作者”的功能,可以帮助揭示科学实践的特征以及有关理论如何具体化的例子。结果,它确定了现代科学的发展方式,以及多位作者,小组作者如何解释知识,被引证归因的优点等。本文着重介绍了作者身份归因的复杂性以及重新思考泛化的必要性评估科学的文献计量技术要考虑其他方面,而不仅仅是作者列表。
更新日期:2017-12-21
down
wechat
bug