It is always an honor when, after one publishes a study, somebody takes the time and effort to figure out how it could have been done better (Lindenberg et al., 2018; Przepiorka, 2019). It is a public service, and we are grateful for the effort. Although we are and remain quite proud of our studies and their results, there is, as in any study, always room for improvement and it is certainly important to test hypotheses also via other designs. However, we feel there are a number of misinterpretations, omissions, and confusions in Dr. Przepiorka’s comments, each of which we would like to discuss.

中文翻译：

---

回复 Wojtek Przepiorka：测试目标框架和享乐虚伪

当有人发表研究后，有人花时间和精力来弄清楚如何做得更好，这总是一种荣幸（Lindenberg 等人，2018 年；Przepiorka，2019 年）。这是一项公共服务，我们感谢他们的努力。尽管我们对我们的研究及其结果感到非常自豪，但与任何研究一样，总有改进的空间，通过其他设计来检验假设当然很重要。然而，我们认为在 Przepiorka 博士的评论中存在许多误解、遗漏和混淆，我们想讨论每一个。