Objectives The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence (IPV) across sexual orientation groups among U.S. adults. Method From 2010 to 2012, national probability samples (n = 41,174) of English- or Spanish-speaking noninstitutionalized U.S. adults were interviewed to assess the prevalence of violence and injury as part of the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. National estimates across sexual orientation groups were compared. Results Compared with heterosexual women, both bisexual women and lesbians experienced more contact sexual violence (CSV) and noncontact unwanted sexual violence by any perpetrator. In addition, bisexual women experienced more stalking by any perpetrator, IPV, and IPV-related impact than did heterosexual women. Compared with lesbians, bisexual women reported more CSV and stalking by any perpetrator, IPV, and IPV-related impact. Compared with heterosexual men, both bisexual and gay men experienced more CSV and noncontact unwanted sexual violence, and gay men experienced more stalking. Although there were no detected statistically significant differences in the prevalence of IPV overall, gay men did report more IPV-related impacts compared with heterosexual men. Conclusion Results reveal a significantly elevated burden of violence experienced by certain sexual minorities.

中文翻译：

---

美国的性暴力，缠扰行为和性伴侣的亲密伴侣暴力。

目的本研究的目的是评估美国成年人中性取向群体之间的性暴力，缠扰和亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）的患病率。方法2010年至2012年，作为国家亲密伴侣和性暴力调查的一部分，对英语或西班牙语非机构化美国成年人的国家概率样本（n = 41,174）进行了访谈，以评估暴力和伤害的患病率。比较了全国性取向人群的估计值。结果与异性恋女性相比，双性恋女性和女同性恋者都遭受了更多的接触性暴力（CSV）和非接触性非自愿性暴力。此外，与异性恋女性相比，双性恋女性在任何犯罪者，IPV和与IPV相关的影响下遭受的跟踪更多。与女同志相比 双性恋女性报告说，任何犯罪者，IPV和与IPV相关的影响，都有更多的CSV和跟踪现象。与异性恋男人相比，双性恋和同性恋者都经历了更多的CSV和非接触性的有害性暴力，而同性恋者则经历了更多的跟踪。尽管总体上未发现IPV患病率在统计学上有显着差异，但与异性恋男人相比，男同性恋确实报告了更多的IPV相关影响。结论结果表明，某些性少数群体遭受的暴力负担明显增加。尽管总体上未发现IPV患病率在统计学上有显着差异，但与异性恋男人相比，男同性恋确实报告了更多的IPV相关影响。结论结果表明，某些性少数群体遭受的暴力负担明显增加。尽管在整体IPV患病率方面没有发现统计学上的显着差异，但与异性恋男性相比，男同性恋确实报告了更多的IPV相关影响。结论结果表明，某些性少数群体遭受的暴力负担明显增加。