Vishwanath (2014) presented analyses and proposed conjectures aimed at a unified understanding of both qualitative and quantitative aspects of stereopsis in pictorial and natural (real-world) 3-dimensional (3D) vision. A recent commentary by Rogers (2019) conceded the key argument in the article that stereopsis can be induced in the absence of binocular disparity and motion parallax, but criticized the wider analyses and conjectures. Rogers contends that a focus on visual appearance and qualitative aspects of 3D perception is unproductive and that the analysis of pictorial space perception adds little to our wider understanding of 3D vision. I argue here that the critique is not persuasive as it misconstrues the distinction between qualitative and quantitative aspects of perception and its claims regarding pictorial depth perception rely on introspections that often do not align with the empirical record. I reaffirm that an integrative focus on both qualitative and quantitative aspects of both pictorial and natural 3D perception is crucial for advancing an understanding of the complex phenomenon of stereopsis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

推进立体视的新理论：对罗杰斯的回应（2019）。

Vishwanath（2014）提出了分析和提出的猜想，旨在统一理解绘画和自然（现实世界）3维（3D）视觉中的立体视的定性和定量方面。罗杰斯（2019）最近的评论承认了文章中的主要论点，即在没有双目视差和运动视差的情况下可以诱发立体视，但批评了更广泛的分析和猜想。罗杰斯认为，对视觉外观和3D感知的定性方面的关注是徒劳的，对图片空间感知的分析对我们对3D视觉的更广泛理解几乎没有帮助。我在这里辩称，这种批评并不具有说服力，因为它曲解了知觉的定性和定量方面之间的区别，并且它关于绘画深度知觉的主张依赖于常常与经验记录不符的内省。我重申，对图像和自然3D感知的定性和定量方面的综合关注对于增进对立体视的复杂现象的理解至关重要。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2019 APA，保留所有权利）。