当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychoanalytic Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Thinking About Assessment: Further Evidence of the Validity of the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition as a Measure of Mentalistic Abilities.
Psychoanalytic Psychology ( IF 1.0 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 , DOI: 10.1037/pap0000130
Andrea Fossati , Serena Borroni , Isabel Dziobek , Peter Fonagy , Antonella Somma

The present study aimed to evaluate the nomological network validity of the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) in its Italian translation, addressing distinct research questions in 3 independent samples of Italian participants comprising adolescent nonclinical participants (N = 393), adult nonclinical participants (N = 193), and adult outpatients with a personality disorder (PD) diagnosis who sought psychotherapy treatment (N = 59). In all 3 samples, the MASC proved to be a reliable measure of mentalizing ability, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from .70 to .78. In both nonclinical adolescents and nonclinical adults, the MASC scores correlated significantly and meaningfully with the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test scores. In nonclinical adults, the MASC scores showed significant (albeit modest) correlations with self-reported measures of attachment styles. Finally, in adult outpatients, the MASC “no theory of mind (ToM)” scores, which are specific errors that indicating nonmentalistic responses, correlated significantly with interview-based measures (Spearman r = .41, p < .01) and self-reported measures (Spearman r = .37, p < .01) of borderline personality disorder (BPD), as well as with measures of emotion dysregulation, (Spearman r = .37, p < .01). As a whole, these findings highlight the validity of the MASC as a measure of mentalization and are consistent with Fonagy and colleagues’ (i.e., Bateman & Fonagy, 2004b; Fonagy, 1991) model of mentalization and its role in personality pathology.

中文翻译:

关于评估的思考:电影作为衡量心理能力的社会认知评估有效性的进一步证据。

本研究旨在评估意大利语翻译中社会认知评估电影 (MASC) 的规则网络有效性,解决了意大利参与者的 3 个独立样本中的不同研究问题,包括青少年非临床参与者 (N = 393)、成人非临床参与者参与者(N = 193),以及寻求心理治疗的患有人格障碍(PD)的成年门诊患者(N = 59)。在所有 3 个样本中,MASC 被证明是心理化能力的可靠衡量标准,Cronbach 的 alpha 值范围从 0.70 到 0.78。在非临床青少年和非临床成人中,MASC 分数与读心眼测试分数显着且有意义地相关。在非临床成人中,MASC 分数与自我报告的依恋风格测量值显示出显着(尽管适度)的相关性。最后,在成人门诊患者中,MASC“无心理理论(ToM)”分数是表明非心理反应的特定错误,与基于访谈的测量(Spearman r = .41,p < .01)和自我评估显着相关。报告了边缘型人格障碍 (BPD) 的测量值 (Spearman r = .37, p < .01),以及情绪失调的测量值 (Spearman r = .37, p < .01)。总的来说,这些发现强调了 MASC 作为心理化测量的有效性,并且与 Fonagy 及其同事(即,Bateman & Fonagy,2004b;Fonagy,1991)的心理化模型及其在人格病理学中的作用一致。MASC“无心理理论(ToM)”分数是表明非心理反应的特定错误,与基于访谈的测量(Spearman r = .41,p < .01)和自我报告的测量(Spearman r = .37, p < .01) 的边缘型人格障碍 (BPD),以及情绪失调的测量,(Spearman r = .37, p < .01)。总的来说,这些发现强调了 MASC 作为心理化测量的有效性,并且与 Fonagy 及其同事(即 Bateman & Fonagy,2004b;Fonagy,1991)的心理化模型及其在人格病理学中的作用一致。MASC“无心理理论(ToM)”分数是表明非心理反应的特定错误,与基于访谈的测量(Spearman r = .41,p < .01)和自我报告的测量(Spearman r = .37, p < .01) 的边缘型人格障碍 (BPD),以及情绪失调的测量,(Spearman r = .37, p < .01)。总的来说,这些发现强调了 MASC 作为心理化测量的有效性,并且与 Fonagy 及其同事(即 Bateman & Fonagy,2004b;Fonagy,1991)的心理化模型及其在人格病理学中的作用一致。.01) 边缘型人格障碍 (BPD),以及情绪失调的测量,(Spearman r = .37,p < .01)。总的来说,这些发现强调了 MASC 作为心理化测量的有效性,并且与 Fonagy 及其同事(即,Bateman & Fonagy,2004b;Fonagy,1991)的心理化模型及其在人格病理学中的作用一致。.01)边缘型人格障碍(BPD),以及情绪失调的测量,(Spearman r = .37,p < .01)。总的来说,这些发现强调了 MASC 作为心理化测量的有效性,并且与 Fonagy 及其同事(即 Bateman & Fonagy,2004b;Fonagy,1991)的心理化模型及其在人格病理学中的作用一致。
更新日期:2018-01-01
down
wechat
bug