The starting point of this comment is Juliana M. Zanotto’s (2020) recent paper in Planning Theory: ‘The role of discourses in enacting neoliberal urbanism. Understanding the relationship between ideology and discourse in planning’. It is one of many in a line of papers in the field of planning theory, and related fields such as political geography and political economy (e.g. Peck, 2004), that take neoliberalism as their focus of study or attack. This comment is not so much, or not only, directed at Zanotto’s paper (which contains a very relevant and interesting conceptual discussion of discourse and ideology), as it is at the general treatment of the concept of neoliberalism in planning theory and practice.

中文翻译：

---

如果说新自由主义就是一切，也许什么都不是

该评论的出发点是朱莉安娜·M·赞诺托（Juliana M. 在计划中理解思想与话语之间的关系。这是规划理论领域以及相关领域（如政治地理和政治经济学）中众多论文之一（例如Peck，2004年），它们以新自由主义为研究或攻击重点。这篇评论不是针对Zanotto的论文，而是针对于计划理论和实践中对新自由主义概念的一般性论述，该评论不仅仅针对Zanotto的论文（该论文包含有关话语和意识形态的非常相关且有趣的概念性讨论）。