Insurgent planning and radical planning are two of the most popular conceptual frames of reference for progressive planners and theorists of transformative planning practices. In the past decades, scholars have extended these two planning conceptions to new geographies and realities to shed light on how planning can challenge structural injustices and marginalization. However, less attention has been given to how insurgent planning renovates radical planning practices in response to the crisis of neoliberal urbanization. While appreciating that radical and insurgent planning remain braided in practice, this article contributes to the literature on transformative planning by highlighting how insurgent planning builds on radical planning and innovates with regard to social location, epistemic distinction, and analytical unit.

叛乱计划和激进计划是渐进式计划者和变革性计划实践理论家最常用的两个概念性参考框架。在过去的几十年中，学者们将这两个计划概念扩展到了新的地区和现实，以阐明计划如何挑战结构性的不公正和边缘化。但是，人们对反叛性计划如何响应新自由主义城市化危机而革新性的激进计划做法的关注却很少。在赞赏激进和叛乱计划仍在实践中扎根的同时，本文通过强调叛乱计划如何建立在激进计划之上并在社会位置，认识论区分和分析单位方面进行创新，为有关变革性计划的文献做出了贡献。