In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three in particular: (a) (urban) institutions as the first subject of justice, (b) the incomplete overlap between social justice and distributive justice, (c) the distinction between the concept and the conceptions of social justice. The impression is that these three issues are not always recognised, or at least not always to the fullest extent, in the current debate in planning theory.

中文翻译：

---

公正的城市。三个背景问题：制度正义与空间正义，社会正义与分配正义，正义观与正义观

在规划理论和人文地理领域，对正义城市的讨论日益增多。给人的印象是，为了继续讨论公正城市的关键问题，某些方法上的考虑和预防措施是必要的。该条特别着重于三个方面：（a）（城市）机构是司法的第一主体，（b）社会正义与分配正义之间的不完全重叠，（c）社会正义的概念与概念之间的区别。给人的印象是，在当前的规划理论辩论中，这三个问题并非总是被认识到，或者至少并非总是被最大程度地认识到。