Risk assessment is a prominent feature of managed migration regimes. How risk is conceptualised and operationalised, however, is highly contested terrain. The extent to which immigration detention represents an appropriate response to specific risks posed by people with contingent or no legal status is particularly hotly debated. In the UK, an early adopter and until recently an eager developer of detention , the policy is that immigration officers carry out individualised risk assessments on each person detained, considering removal prospects, risk of flight, and offending as well as the risk of harm to the individual. Drawing on published reports, government statistics, and interviews with close observers, this article explores the premises, policy, practice, and outcomes of these processes. The analysis flags multiple issues, suggesting that risk evaluation in relation to immigration detention is far from a well-oiled and reliable machine, causes unnecessary human harm, operates in a way that generates unforeseen risks for wider society, and points to other logics shaping detention.

中文翻译：

---

我们在害怕什么？探索风险和移民拘留

风险评估是管理迁移制度的一个突出特点。然而，如何将风险概念化和操作化是一个极具争议的领域。移民拘留在多大程度上代表了对具有或有或没有法律地位的人所构成的特定风险的适当反应，这一点引起了特别激烈的争论。在英国，该政策是拘留的早期采用者和直到最近的热切开发者，政策是移民官员对每个被拘留的人进行个性化的风险评估，考虑到被驱逐的前景、逃跑和冒犯的风险以及对被拘留者的伤害风险。个人。本文利用已发表的报告、政府统计数据以及对密切观察者的采访，探讨了这些过程的前提、政策、实践和结果。分析指出了多个问题，