当前位置: X-MOL 学术Methodology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Similarities Between Ranking and Rating Measures of Values Preferences
Methodology ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2017-07-01 , DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000135
Guy Moors 1 , Ingrid Vriens 1 , John Gelissen 1
Affiliation  

The form-resistant hypothesis states that alternative ways of measuring the same values should be small if method-specific features are taken into account. However, previous research that compared rating and ranking questionnaires for measuring values has shown mixed results. We suggest that adopting a latent class segmentation approach helps to explain these mixed results by identifying segments with similar item preference structures and segments linked to one format only. Our approach is applied to a Dutch survey on work values. In both ranking and rating mode, we find two similar segments reflecting the intrinsic and extrinsic preference structure, while other segments differed between modes. In line with the modified form-resistant hypothesis, the results suggest the same latent preference structure has guided particular segments in a population to respond similarly to rating and ranking questions.

中文翻译:

偏好值的排名和评级度量之间的相似性

形式抗性假设指出,如果考虑到特定于方法的功能,则测量相同值的替代方法应很小。但是,以前的研究比较了对调查问卷进行评级和排名以衡量价值的结果,结果不一。我们建议采用潜在类别细分方法,通过识别具有相似项目偏好结构的细分以及仅链接到一种格式的细分,有助于解释这些混合结果。我们的方法适用于荷兰的工作价值调查。在排名和评级模式下,我们发现两个相似的细分反映了内在和外在的偏好结构,而其他细分则在模式之间有所不同。符合修改后的抗形式假说,
更新日期:2017-07-01
down
wechat
bug