当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Substance or Semantics? The Consequences of Definitional Ambiguity for White-collar Research
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-12 , DOI: 10.1177/0022427819888012
Miranda A. Galvin 1, 2
Affiliation  

Objectives: To determine whether different conceptions (Populist, Patrician) and operationalizations of “white-collar crime” produce different substantive conclusions, using the applied case of sentencing in federal criminal court. Method: Federal Justice Statistics Program data are used to identify white-collar and comparable crimes referred for prosecution in 2009 to 2011 that were also sentenced through 2013. Five different operational strategies are used to identify “white-collar crime” and are employed in separate hurdle regressions jointly capturing incarceration and sentence length. Differences in model coefficients and case composition are discussed across definitions. Results: There are differences in the relationship between “white-collar crime” and incarceration both between and within Populist and Patrician conceptions. These differences are most pronounced at the in/out decision but are also present for sentence length. Conclusions: Contradictory findings from past research are largely able to be replicated within a single sample simply by changing the conception and operationalization of white-collar crime used. This demonstrates that debating what is “truly” white-collar crime is not just an exercise in semantics—it is a conceptual and methodological choice that can have dramatic consequences on what (we think) we know about the treatment of white-collar crime in the criminal justice system.

中文翻译:

物质还是语义?白领研究中定义歧义的后果

目的:使用联邦刑事法院的量刑案例,确定不同的概念(民粹主义者,贵族派)和“白领犯罪”的实施是否产生不同的实质性结论。方法:联邦司法统计计划的数据用于识别在2009年至2011年被起诉的白领和类似犯罪,这些犯罪也被判刑到2013年。五种不同的操作策略用于识别“白领犯罪”,并分别采用跨栏回归可共同捕获监禁和句子长度。在定义中讨论了模型系数和案例组成的差异。结果:民粹主义和帕特里克主义观念之间以及内部的“白领犯罪”与监禁之间的关系存在差异。这些差异在输入/输出决定中最明显,但在句子长度方面也存在。结论:只需改变所使用的白领犯罪的概念和操作性,就可以在单个样本中复制过去研究中的矛盾结论。这表明,辩论什么是“真正的”白领犯罪不仅是一种语义练习,而且是一种概念和方法选择,可能会对我们了解的有关白领犯罪的处理(我们认为)产生重大影响。刑事司法系统。只需更改所使用的白领犯罪的概念和可操作性,就可以在单个样本中复制过去研究中的矛盾结论。这表明,辩论什么是“真正的”白领犯罪不仅是一种语义练习,而且是一种概念和方法选择,可能会对我们了解的有关白领犯罪的处理(我们认为)产生重大影响。刑事司法系统。只需更改所使用的白领犯罪的概念和可操作性,就可以在单个样本中复制过去研究中的矛盾结论。这表明,辩论什么是“真正的”白领犯罪不仅是一种语义练习,而且是一种概念和方法选择,可能会对我们了解的有关白领犯罪的处理(我们认为)产生重大影响。刑事司法系统。
更新日期:2019-11-12
down
wechat
bug