当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Individual Differences
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Forced-Choice Versus Likert Responses on an Occupational Big Five Questionnaire
Journal of Individual Differences ( IF 2.608 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-01 , DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000285 Luc Watrin 1 , Mattis Geiger 2 , Maik Spengler 1 , Oliver Wilhelm 2
Journal of Individual Differences ( IF 2.608 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-01 , DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000285 Luc Watrin 1 , Mattis Geiger 2 , Maik Spengler 1 , Oliver Wilhelm 2
Affiliation
Abstract. Conventional self-report measures are prone to response biases, which distort measurement in any applied assessment. The forced-choice (FC) format was proposed as a potential remedy for t...
中文翻译:
职业大五问卷的强迫选择与李克特反应
摘要。常规的自我报告测度容易产生响应偏差,在任何应用评估中都会扭曲测度。提议采用强制选择(FC)格式作为对...的潜在补救措施。
更新日期:2019-07-01
中文翻译:
职业大五问卷的强迫选择与李克特反应
摘要。常规的自我报告测度容易产生响应偏差,在任何应用评估中都会扭曲测度。提议采用强制选择(FC)格式作为对...的潜在补救措施。