The article is about a set of methodological disruptions that occur in ethnographic fieldwork and what these disruptions mean for ethnographic studies, including analysis, representation of data, and experiences of the ethnographic self. This article documents the process of a minoritized high school youth, Queen, entering the research space and the emergent relations among Queen and Latinx undocumented youth. Drawing on Jacques Derrida’s analytics, I theorize disruption as a core concept in this particular experience of engaging in fieldwork as part of a multisite critical ethnography. Presenting three frames of disruption—relating to the research space, analyses and findings, and the ethnographic self—I complicate who gets included and excluded from a study and the implications for relational ethnics in ethnographic fieldwork. Ultimately, I argue that our methodological practices and selves need to be disrupted in order to enhance our views of who/what gets included/excluded during our fieldwork.

中文翻译：

---

“你是社会学家，我也是。. . ”：在（大部分）无证青年的实地考察中引诱民族志学者、干扰和歧义

这篇文章是关于在民族志田野工作中发生的一系列方法论中断，以及这些中断对民族志研究意味着什么，包括分析、数据表示和民族志自我的经验。本文记录了少数族裔高中青年 Queen 进入研究领域的过程以及 Queen 与拉丁裔无证青年之间的新兴关系。借鉴 Jacques Derrida 的分析，我将破坏理论化为参与作为多地点批判性民族志一部分的田野调查的特殊体验的核心概念。提出三个破坏框架——与研究空间、分析和发现以及民族志自我有关——我使谁被包括和排除在研究之外，以及在民族志田野工作中对关系民族的影响复杂化。最终，