In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called “replication crisis” has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.

中文翻译：

---

传播开放科学议程

在过去的 10 年中，社会科学中的许多经典发现似乎都不可靠。这种所谓的“复制危机”激发了对开放科学实践的呼吁，旨在提高研究结果的可重复性、可复制性和普遍性。传播研究面临许多相同的挑战，这些挑战导致其他领域的可复制性低。因此，我们提出了在传播中采用开放科学实践的议程，其中包括以下七项建议：（1）发布材料、数据和代码；(2) 预注册研究并提交注册报告；（三）进行复制；(4) 合作；(5) 培养开放科学技能；（六）实施透明公开促进指引；(7) 激励开放科学实践。虽然在我们的议程中我们主要关注定量研究，我们还反思与定性研究相关的开放科学实践。我们最后讨论了与开放科学实践相关的潜在反对意见和担忧。