Assessing the product functions associating them with the manufacturability aspects is crucial to reducing the manufacturing cost. Similarly, delivering project solutions with real costs compatible with the values perceived by the customer becomes a relevant aspect for the success of a launch. Even in a concurrent engineering environment, there are no relevant tools that associate the Value Engineering (VE) concepts, where each function value is measured and comparing one by one, with the cost achieved in each of these same functions after application of the Design for Assembly (DFA). This study analyzed a proposal of applying an iterative method for IPDP, based on established EV and DFA techniques, which seeks the balance between value and cost of all functions of a mechanical subset. Thus, it was possible to evaluate the method application and analyze both its gains and its limitations. Then, the original design was compared with the solution after the proposal application. Finally, was verified the influence of the method on the balance between the value and the cost of each function, in addition to the direct comparison of the solution cost with the version without the method application. Among the results, this article presents a report showing the method viability, its, impacts and limitations.

评估将产品功能与可制造性相关联的产品功能对于降低制造成本至关重要。同样，交付具有与客户认为的价值相称的实际成本的项目解决方案也成为启动成功的重要方面。即使在并发的工程环境中，也没有相关的工具可以将“价值工程”（VE）概念关联在一起，在“价值工程”概念中，对每个功能值进行测量并逐一进行比较，并应用“组装（DFA）。这项研究分析了基于已建立的EV和DFA技术对IPDP应用迭代方法的提案，该提案寻求机械子集所有功能的价值和成本之间的平衡。从而，可以评估该方法的应用并分析其收益和局限性。然后，将原始设计与提案申请后的解决方案进行比较。最后，除了直接比较不使用该方法的版本的解决方案成本之外，还验证了该方法对每个函数的价值和成本之间的平衡的影响。在结果中，本文提供了一份报告，显示了该方法的可行性，影响，局限性。除了直接比较解决方案成本与不带方法应用程序的版本之外。在结果中，本文提供了一份报告，显示了该方法的可行性，影响，局限性。除了直接比较解决方案成本与不带方法应用程序的版本之外。在结果中，本文提供了一份报告，显示了该方法的可行性，影响，局限性。