According to Rec. 40A.1 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), the indication of the nomenclatural type should immediately follow the description or diagnosis and should include the Latin word “typus” or “holotypus”. However, Art. 40.6 states “indication of the type must include one of the words “typus” or “holotypus”, or its abbreviation, or its equivalent in a modern language”. We are of the opinion, therefore, that there is no need for Rec. 40A.1 to recommend using the Latin word “typus” or “holotypus”, and we propose the following change.

中文翻译：

---

（044）修改建议40A.1的提案

根据建议。深圳法典》第40A.1条（Turland等人，Regnum Veg.159.2018 ）中的术语名称应立即跟随描述或诊断，并应包括拉丁词``typus''或``holotypus''。但是，艺术。40.6指出“类型的说明必须包括单词“ typus”或“ holotypus”之一，或其缩写，或与现代语言等效的文字。因此，我们认为不需要Rec。建议使用40A.1拉丁词“ typus”或“ holotypus”，我们建议进行以下更改。