[https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35119]

Recently, a Pubpeer note has highlighted similarities between different images in two Figures of our paper entitled "In vivo integration of poly(e‐caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous nerve guide seeded with teeth derived stem cells for peripheral nerve regeneration" that was published with DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35119)

Indeed, image duplications in microscopy images shown in Figures 12 (first two images) and 13 seem to have been occurred. We tried our best to retrieve the information to elucidate the origin of these irregularities. It appeared that image duplications are due to unintentional mislabeling of the same images stored in different folder.

These image duplications by no means change our conclusions, since the aim was to show the presence of P75 positive cells in both cell‐loaded scaffold and simple scaffold.

Following a search in our archives, we have found the original images and would like to publish a corrective note to show the correct images (Please see the attached figure).We deeply apologize for this unintentional mistake, which occurred during manuscript preparation, and would like to request a correction, providing new images for Figures 13 to avoid any potential ambiguities in the future.

[https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35119]

最近，在发表于DOI的题为“聚（ε-己内酯）/明胶纳米纤维神经导管植入牙齿衍生干细胞用于外周神经再生的论文”的两个图中，Pubpeer的注释强调了不同图像之间的相似性。 ：10.1002 / jbm.a.35119）

实际上，似乎已经发生了图12（前两个图像）和13中所示的显微镜图像中的图像重复。我们尽力检索信息以阐明这些违规行为的根源。图像复制似乎是由于无意中错误地标记了存储在不同文件夹中的相同图像而引起的。

这些图像重复绝不会改变我们的结论，因为目的是显示在装有细胞的支架和简单支架中都存在P75阳性细胞。

在我们的档案库中进行搜索之后，我们找到了原始图像，并希望发布更正说明以显示正确的图像（请参见附图）。对于这一在文档准备期间发生的无意错误，我们深表歉意，并且会为了请求更正，请为图13提供新图像，以避免将来出现任何潜在的歧义。