Abstract:Over the past ten years, Dunsmuir v New Brunswick has become a focal point in scholarly and judicial discourse regarding the law of judicial review. But, despite its influential status, the author argues that the reasoning in Dunsmuir cannot be easily reconciled with paradigmatic cases in Canadian administrative law, which regard transparency, fairness, and reasoned justification as essential rule-of-law safeguards against arbitrary governmental action. By juxtaposing Dunsmuir with a principled understanding of these paradigmatic cases, the author concludes that the reasoning in Dunsmuir serves to undermine, rather than reinforce, the fundamental principles which might otherwise ensure the legitimacy of administrative law.

中文翻译：

---

邓斯缪尔的断线

摘要：过去十年，Dunsmuir v New Brunswick 案已成为有关司法审查法的学术和司法话语的焦点。但是，尽管具有影响力，作者认为邓斯缪尔案的推理与加拿大行政法中的典型案例并不容易协调，后者将透明度、公平和合理的理由视为防止任意政府行为的基本法治保障。通过将邓斯缪尔与对这些范式案例的原则性理解并置，作者得出结论，邓斯缪尔的推理有助于破坏而不是加强可能确保行政法合法性的基本原则。