This commentary is in response to “Diversity in the Professional Psychology Training-to-Workforce Pipeline: Results From Doctoral Psychology Student Population Data” by Callahan and colleagues (2018). They found that despite no significant differences with regard to academic qualifications pertaining to GPA and GRE scores, students who identified as African American/Black or Hispanic/Latino were underrepresented in doctoral-level accredited psychology training programs as well as having higher attrition rates. In this commentary, I argue that our current efforts, while well intended, are too fragmented and, thus, there needs to be a more concerted effort and shared responsibility to address the underrepresentation of ethnic and racial minorities in psychology. Additional points for consideration are added to further the dialogue started by Callahan and colleagues.

中文翻译：

---

在多样化的心理中，需要一个村庄才能实现有意义且可持续的变化。

本评论是对 Callahan 及其同事（2018 年）的“专业心理学培训到劳动力管道的多样性：来自博士心理学学生人口数据的结果”的回应。他们发现，尽管与 GPA 和 GRE 分数有关的学历没有显着差异，但被认定为非裔美国人/黑人或西班牙裔/拉丁裔的学生在博士级认可的心理学培训项目中的代表性不足，并且流失率较高。在这篇评论中，我认为我们目前的努力虽然意图良好，但过于分散，因此，需要更加协调一致的努力和共同的责任来解决心理学中少数族裔和种族代表性不足的问题。