It all depends on where you start. For free speech questions arising under the First Amendment, as for a cornucopia of other legal topics, a single set of facts or a single question may be placed in any of a number of different doctrinal categories, with the category selected determining not only the analytic approach but also often the outcome as well. Psychologists and other social scientists refer to this phenomenon as framing, and framing effects are as important in law as they are in most other aspects of our lives.

中文翻译：

---

不只是关于车牌：第一修正案中邦联退伍军人的沃克夫之子、政府演讲和教义重叠

这一切都取决于你从哪里开始。对于第一修正案引起的言论自由问题，对于其他法律主题的聚宝盆，一组事实或一个问题可以放在许多不同的教义类别中的任何一个类别中，所选择的类别不仅决定了分析方法，但往往也是结果。心理学家和其他社会科学家将这种现象称为框架，框架效应在法律中与在我们生活的大多数其他方面一样重要。