当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Supreme Court Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Functional Equivalence and Residual Rights Post-Carpenter: Framing a Test Consistent with Precedent and Original Meaning
The Supreme Court Review ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-01 , DOI: 10.1086/704133
Laura K. Donohue

The evolution of Fourth Amendment doctrine over the past century bears a striking resemblance to Hamlet’s descent into insanity. Step by step, faced by increasingly sophisticated technologies, the Court has crafted rules, exceptions, and exceptions to the exceptions, until we find ourselves in an incoherent world that bears little relationship to the original rights it encompasses. The Founders introduced the Fourth Amendment to secure liberty. The clause reinforced the right of the people, as sovereign, to determine the conditions under which the government could intrude

中文翻译:

功能对等和剩余权利后木匠:构建一个与先例和原始含义一致的测试

过去一个世纪第四修正案学说的演变与哈姆雷特陷入精神错乱有着惊人的相似之处。一步一步地,面对日益复杂的技术,法院制定了规则、例外和例外的例外,直到我们发现自己处于一个与它所包含的原始权利几乎没有关系的不连贯的世界。创始人提出了第四修正案以确保自由。该条款强化了作为主权者的人民决定政府可以干预的条件的权利
更新日期:2019-05-01
down
wechat
bug