The main objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the available evidence on the influence of parental styles and dimensions on the development of adolescents’ externalizing behaviors. As a novelty, this review offers an analysis of possible differences in paternal and maternal parenting practices and the role of gender in adolescents will be d. The methodology used consisted of a systematic search of articles in s (Medline, Cochrane, Academic Search Premier, PsycINFO, ERIC y PsycARTICLES) and their lists of bibliographic references published between 2010 and 2016. Initially, we located 31,169 studies, of which 31,019 were excluded because they were either duplicates or did not meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The remaining articles were again reviewed in full text and were subjected to the assessment of bias risk, of which 17 had an adequate level of methodological quality, and so were d in the systematic review. The results suggest that the parenting style most closely associated with externalizing problems is the authoritarian style. In contrast, the authoritative parental style and the dimensions of affection, communication, and autonomy promotion guarantee positive results. A larger number of studies are deemed necessary to establish firm conclusions about aspects such as differences between parents’ parenting style or adolescents’ gender.

中文翻译：

---

父母作风和其他社会心理变量对青少年外在化行为发展的影响：系统评价

该系统评价的主要目的是综合有关父母的方式和尺寸对青少年外在行为发展的影响的现有证据。作为一种新颖性，本综述提供了对父母和母亲养育方式可能存在差异的分析，并且将探讨性别在青少年中的作用。所使用的方法包括对s中的文章（Medline，Cochrane，Academic Search Premier，PsycINFO，ERIC y PsycARTICLES）进行系统搜索，以及他们在2010年至2016年之间发布的书目参考文献列表。最初，我们找到了31,169篇研究，其中31,019篇是排除，因为它们要么重复，要么不符合纳入和排除标准。其余文章再次进行了全文审核，并进行了偏倚风险评估，其中有17项具有足够的方法学质量，因此在系统评价中也是如此。结果表明，与外部化问题最密切相关的育儿方式是独裁方式。相比之下，权威的父母风格以及情感，沟通和自主发展的维度保证了积极的结果。为了对诸如父母之间的父母养育方式或青少年性别之间的差异等方面建立可靠的结论，需要进行大量研究。自主促进保证取得积极成果。为了对诸如父母之间的父母养育方式或青少年性别之间的差异等方面建立可靠的结论，需要进行大量研究。自主促进保证取得积极成果。为了对诸如父母之间的父母养育方式或青少年性别之间的差异等方面建立可靠的结论，需要进行大量研究。