Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA) is a verbal lie detection tool consisting of several interview techniques. These techniques have been examined separately but never together. Reflecting the dynamic nature of CCA we combined several of the techniques (free recall followed by a model statement, followed by a reverse order instruction, and followed by a sketch instruction). We examined the new information provided after each stage of the interview and also compared the information provided in the initial recall with the information provided after the entire interview. A total of 47 truth tellers and 47 lie tellers went on a mission. Truth tellers were asked to report their mission truthfully, whereas lie tellers were requested to lie about several aspects of the mission. We measured the total units of information (total details) provided in the interview and the number of complications reported. The results indicate that the pre-registered hypothesis (Hypothesis 1) was supported for complications. Truth tellers reported more complications than lie tellers in each stage of the interview and the difference was more pronounced after the entire interview than after the free recall. As a conclusion, CCA was an effective lie detection method when complications were taken into account.

中文翻译：

---

结合言语准确性评估技术来区分真相出纳员

认知可信度评估（CCA）是一种口头谎言检测工具，包含几种面试技巧。这些技术已经过单独检查，但从未一起检查过。为了反映CCA的动态性质，我们结合了多种技术（自由召回，模型声明，反向指令，草图指令）。我们检查了访谈每个阶段之后提供的新信息，并将初始召回中提供的信息与整个访谈之后提供的信息进行了比较。总共47位真相算命者和47位说谎者算命了。真相出纳员被要求如实报告任务，而谎言出纳员则被要求对任务的几个方面撒谎。我们测量了采访中提供的信息的总单位（总详细信息）以及报告的并发症数量。结果表明，预先注册的假设（假设1）支持并发症。在面试的每个阶段，真相出纳员报告的并发症比说谎者要多，并且在整个访谈之后，差异更明显。结论是，考虑到并发症，CCA是有效的测谎方法。