Abstract This paper takes the notion of translaboration as a stepping stone for an exploration of some of the recent debates about translational hermeneutics. In doing so, it aims to expand translaboration’s focus beyond concrete collaborations between multiple translators, or authors and translators, and to think about, and theorise, translaboration as a possible means of framing textual agents reading and writing each other within texts. The argument presented draws on both Hans-Georg Gadamer’s and Paul Ricoeur’s conceptions of the individual subject as interpretative agent, and of translation as an object of philosophical enquiry, and adopts the concept of a “hermeneutics of decipherment” ( Maitland 2017 , 38) as an alternative to dialogic models of understanding and translating. Similarly, the relationship between philosophical and translational hermeneutics is interrogated and recast as a translaborative endeavour rather than as an immediately reciprocal dialogue. Translaboration, this paper argues, thus also actively furthers the move away from what Blumczynski ( 2016 , 29) calls “an arborescent epistemological paradigm” of interdisciplinarity and contributes to animating a transdisciplinarity that is fundamentally “rhizomatic” (ibid.; see Deleuze and Guattari 2004 ) in nature.

中文翻译：

---

翻译诠释学的跨实验室案例

摘要本文将“转嫁”的概念作为探索最近有关翻译诠释学的一些辩论的垫脚石。这样做的目的是将翻译工作的重点扩展到多个翻译人员或作者和翻译者之间的具体合作之外，并考虑和理论化翻译工作，这是构筑文本主体在文本内相互读写的一种可能方式。所提出的论点借鉴了汉斯·乔治·加达默尔和保罗·里科尔关于个体主体作为解释性主体的概念，以及将翻译作为哲学研究的对象的观念，并采用“破译的诠释学”的概念（Maitland 2017，38）作为对话模型的理解和翻译的替代方法。同样，哲学和翻译诠释学之间的关系被审问并改写为一种跨实验室的努力，而不是立即进行的相互对话。本文认为，“跨劳动”也积极地远离了Blumczynski（2016，29）所说的跨学科的“树状认识论范式”，并为动画化了本质上是“根茎的”跨学科做出了贡献（同上；参见Deleuze和Guattari。 2004）。