Abstract The article presents two cases of the Arad Medico-Legal Department illustrating just a part of the role of the forensic pathologist at the death scene but there are sufficient to fully justify the importance of this investigation as no example can comprise the complexity of problems and the particularity of each case, nor a statistic can be made. Both cases were found dead at home and forensically autopsied, but the two of them were distinct in terms of forensic pathologist's request death scene participation. In the first case, the autopsy did not find traumatic lesions, but revealed that the death was due to massive hemoptysis caused by cavernous tuberculosis with subsequent exsanguination, microscopically confirmed. The death was nonviolent. In the second case, the autopsy revealed findings of mechanical asphyxia due to neck compression, both macroscopically and microscopically. The death was violent. In both cases the forensic expert participation is required at the death-scene. In the first case it allowed the correct interpretation of the traces of blood found on site, and in the second case, an onsite research would have properly helped for restoring the death‟s occurrence. The scene investigation and autopsy provide, together, the basis for an accurate determination of cause and circumstances of death.

中文翻译：

---

死亡现场调查在确定法医死亡原因和情节中的意义

摘要本文介绍了阿拉德医学法律部门的两个案例，这些案例仅说明了法医病理学家在死亡现场的部分作用，但是有充分的理由可以证明这项调查的重要性，因为没有任何例子可以说明问题的复杂性和每种情况的特殊性，也无法进行统计。这两例病例均发现在家中死亡并经过法医尸检，但在法医病理学家要求死亡现场参与的情况下，两者截然不同。在第一种情况下，尸检没有发现创伤性病变，但显示死亡是由于海绵状结核引起的大量咯血并随后放血，经显微镜证实。死亡是非暴力的。在第二种情况下 尸检从宏观和微观角度揭示了由于颈部受压而导致的机械性窒息。死亡是暴力的。在这两种情况下，死亡现场都需要法医专家的参与。在第一种情况下，它可以正确解释现场发现的血液痕迹；在第二种情况下，现场研究将适当地帮助恢复死亡的发生。现场调查和尸检共同为准确确定死亡原因和死亡情况提供了基础。现场研究将适当地帮助恢复死亡的发生。现场调查和尸检共同为准确确定死亡原因和死亡情况提供了基础。现场研究将适当地帮助恢复死亡的发生。现场调查和尸检共同为准确确定死亡原因和死亡情况提供了基础。