Abstract The legal terminology represents a specialised language by which both the lawmaker and the person implementing the law focus on a pre-established communication channel which guarantee for the stability, the accessibility and the predictability of the law, as well as on the juridical security. In the situations when the law moves away from various reasons from the unanimously agreed meaning, imbalances are triggered in practice. In order to re-establish the balance of the law, the Constitutional Court intervenes in decisive situations. Thus, our instance of constitutional contentious has been seized on the exception of non-Constitutionality of the provisions of the art. 249 par. (1) of the Criminal Law in 1969 and of the art. 298 of the Criminal Law. The authors of the exception asked the Court to notice that the provisions of the art. 298 of the Criminal Law are constitutional only in the measure when the phrase “it fails to accomplish it” from their contents mean “it accomplishes it by breaking the law”.

中文翻译：

---

宪法法院法学中法律术语的澄清

摘要法律术语代表一种特殊的语言，立法者和实施法律的人都将注意力集中在预先建立的沟通渠道上，以确保法律的稳定性，可及性和可预测性以及司法安全性。在法律因各种原因脱离一致同意的含义的情况下，实际上会引发失衡。为了重新建立法律平衡，宪法法院在决定性情况下进行干预。因此，除了本领域规定的非宪法性之外，我们的宪法争议事例已经被抓住。249杆 （1）1969年的刑法和艺术。刑法第298条。例外的提出者请法院注意该条款的规定。