Abstract As omission of a person is a certain manifestation of his/her internal will from outside. Exactly through inactivity, the internal will of a person materializes due to which a person becomes a participant of public relations. At the same time in the absence of external expression of will inactivity of a person can not cause the occurrence of legal consequences, in particular, to be examined as a reason of origin of tort liabilities. If a person enacted because of negligence or poor awareness, it should be defined: whether a person knew or had to know about the necessity to perform a certain action. Accordingly, if a person possessed such knowledge this form of behavior will be treated as guilty omission, if not – this is an example of innocent omission. Responsibility for illegal omission can arise only when appropriate persons are included in the system of civil and legal relationships, thus are the subjects of civil relations. Damage caused by “reflexive movements” testifies the carelessness of a person to his/her behavior, which reflects his/her will. Therefore, such behavior of a person is considered to be wrongful.

中文翻译：

---

错误的遗漏是侵权责任的条件

摘要由于一个人的疏忽是他/她内在意志的某种体现。正是通过不活动，一个人的内在意志得以实现，因此，一个人成为公共关系的参与者。同时在没有外部意愿表达的情况下，一个人的不作为不能引起法律后果的发生，特别是作为侵权责任起因的被审查。如果一个人是由于疏忽或意识不足而制定的，则应定义：一个人是否知道或必须知道执行某项行动的必要性。因此，如果一个人拥有这样的知识，则这种行为形式将被视为有罪的遗漏，如果没有的话，这将被视为无罪的遗漏。非法遗漏的责任只有在适当的人被纳入民事和法律关系系统中时才可能产生，因此民事关系的主体也应如此。“反身运动”造成的损害证明了一个人对其行为的粗心，反映了他/她的意志。因此，人们的这种行为被认为是不合法的。