Conflicts and their discursive representations involve, apart from the spacio-temporal dimension, also the socio-ideological and axiological positions. These prompt the desired emotional response from the audience in a form of authorization for the intended action. All these dimensions are mainly construed by presenting series of assertions by creating the dichotomy self-other and by triggering implicatures that contribute to the preferred interpretations of the presented representations. This paper aims to examine the role of quotes and historical analogies triggered by quotes in discourse, concretely, it focuses on the way the Ukrainian conflict is proximized in the US and the Czech political discourse, namely in the parliamentary debates and governmental statements (November 2013–December 2014). The theoretical framework applied is the proximization approach (Cap 2008, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2017) which is complemented by the studies that explore the pragmatic functions of quoting in discourse.

中文翻译：

---

通过捷克和美国“乌克兰话语”中的引述和历史类比构建威胁

除了时空维度之外，冲突及其话语表征还涉及社会意识形态和价值论立场。这些以对预期行动的授权形式促使观众产生所需的情绪反应。所有这些维度主要通过通过创建二分法自我他者和触发有助于对所呈现表示的首选解释的含义来呈现一系列断言来解释。本文旨在考察引述和引述在话语中引发的历史类比的作用，具体而言，它侧重于乌克兰冲突在美国和捷克政治话语中的近似化方式，即议会辩论和政府声明（2013 年 11 月） – 2014 年 12 月）。