当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Language and Politics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
We can(’t) do this
Journal of Language and Politics ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2019-08-02 , DOI: 10.1075/jlp.19006.gri
Tim Griebel 1 , Erik Vollmann 1
Affiliation  

Abstract Migration has been a defining topic in the discourse in Germany since the so-called “refugee crisis” in 2015. This corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis systematically reconstructs the discourse about migration in two influential German newspapers, thereby emphasizing the construction of different subject positions for people migrating to Germany. Mass media are an important arena for the fight for hegemony between discursive coalitions of culturalization regimes that are based on openness and closure respectively. The discursive space of the German discourse about migration offers multiple opportunities in this regard. In the left-leaning taz, we detect a general trend to support an open society although some (but often contested) elements of closure are detected in this medium as well. Die Welt leans much more towards closure and the problematization of migration although it also offers a diverse array of interpellations that depend on the usefulness or threating character of people coming to Germany.

中文翻译:

我们不能('t)这样做

摘要 自 2015 年所谓的“难民危机”以来,移民一直是德国话语中的一个定义性话题。这种语料库辅助的批判性话语分析系统地重构了德国两家有影响力的报纸上关于移民的话语,从而强调了不同主题的构建。移居德国的人的职位。大众传媒是分别基于开放性和封闭性的文化化制度的话语联盟之间争夺霸权的重要舞台。德国关于移民的话语空间在这方面提供了多种机会。在左倾的 taz 中,我们发现了支持开放社会的总体趋势,尽管在这种媒体中也发现了一些(但经常有争议的)封闭元素。
更新日期:2019-08-02
down
wechat
bug