当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Human Resources
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Major Malfunction: A Field Experiment Correcting Undergraduates’ Beliefs about Salaries
Journal of Human Resources ( IF 5.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-16 , DOI: 10.3368/jhr.56.3.0317-8599r2 John J. Conlon
Journal of Human Resources ( IF 5.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-16 , DOI: 10.3368/jhr.56.3.0317-8599r2 John J. Conlon
I test, in a field experiment at a flagship state university in the US, whether providing college students salary information can affect their choices of major and classes. I find that undergraduates are substantially misinformed about mean salaries by major. On average, students in my sample underestimate mean salaries, but there is also large heterogeneity in beliefs across individuals. I also find that providing information to correct these errors has a large impact on students’ choices; students in the treatment group were nine percentage points (16%) more likely to major in a field about which they received information.
中文翻译:
主要故障:纠正大学生薪酬观念的现场实验
我在美国一所旗舰州立大学的实地实验中测试,向大学生提供薪资信息是否会影响他们对专业和课程的选择。我发现本科生对专业的平均工资有很大的误解。平均而言,我的样本中的学生低估了平均工资,但个人之间的信念也存在很大的异质性。我还发现提供信息来纠正这些错误对学生的选择有很大的影响;治疗组的学生主修他们获得信息的领域的可能性要高出 9 个百分点 (16%)。
更新日期:2019-09-16
中文翻译:
主要故障:纠正大学生薪酬观念的现场实验
我在美国一所旗舰州立大学的实地实验中测试,向大学生提供薪资信息是否会影响他们对专业和课程的选择。我发现本科生对专业的平均工资有很大的误解。平均而言,我的样本中的学生低估了平均工资,但个人之间的信念也存在很大的异质性。我还发现提供信息来纠正这些错误对学生的选择有很大的影响;治疗组的学生主修他们获得信息的领域的可能性要高出 9 个百分点 (16%)。