当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Human Resources › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Depression, Risk Preferences and Risk-taking Behavior*
Journal of Human Resources ( IF 5.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-10 , DOI: 10.3368/jhr.58.1.0419-10183r1
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark , Sarah C. Dahmann , Nathan Kettlewell

Depression affects the way that people process information and make decisions, including those involving risk and uncertainty. Our objective is to analyze the way that depressive episodes shape risk preferences and risk-taking behaviors. We are the first to address this issue using large-scale, representative panel data that include both behavioral and stated risk preference measures and a theoretical framework that accounts for the multiple pathways through which depression affects risk-taking. We find no disparity in the behavioral risk preferences of the mentally well vs. depressed; yet depression is related to people’s stated risk preferences and risk-taking behaviors in ways that are context-specific. Those who are likely to be experiencing a depressive episode report less willingness to take risks in general, but more willingness to take health risks, for example. We investigate these patterns by developing a conceptual model — informed by the psychological literature — that links depression to risk-taking behavior through the key elements of a standard intertemporal choice problem (e.g., time preferences, expectations, budget constraints). This motivates a mediation analysis in which we show that differences in risk-taking behavior are largely explained by depression-related disparities in behavioral traits such as locus of control, optimism and trust. Overall, we find that there is no overarching tendency for those who are depressive to engage in either more or less risk-taking. Instead, the decision-making context matters in ways that largely align with our theoretical expectations.

中文翻译:

抑郁、风险偏好和冒险行为*

抑郁症会影响人们处理信息和做出决策的方式,包括那些涉及风险和不确定性的方式。我们的目标是分析抑郁发作塑造风险偏好和冒险行为的方式。我们是第一个使用大规模、有代表性的面板数据来解决这个问题的人,这些数据包括行为和陈述的风险偏好措施以及一个理论框架,该框架解释了抑郁症影响冒险的多种途径。我们发现精神健康者与抑郁者的行为风险偏好没有差异;然而,抑郁症与人们陈述的风险偏好和冒险行为以特定于上下文的方式相关。那些可能正在经历抑郁发作的人报告说,总体上不太愿意承担风险,但例如,更愿意承担健康风险。我们通过开发一个概念模型来研究这些模式——由心理学文献提供信息——通过标准跨期选择问题的关键要素(例如,时间偏好、期望、预算限制)将抑郁症与冒险行为联系起来。这激发了中介分析,在该分析中,我们表明冒险行为的差异在很大程度上可以通过与抑郁相关的行为特征(例如控制点、乐观和信任)的差异来解释。总体而言,我们发现抑郁症患者没有更多或更少的冒险倾向。相反,决策背景在很大程度上与我们的理论预期一致。我们通过开发一个概念模型来研究这些模式——由心理学文献提供信息——通过标准跨期选择问题的关键要素(例如,时间偏好、期望、预算限制)将抑郁症与冒险行为联系起来。这激发了中介分析,在该分析中,我们表明冒险行为的差异在很大程度上可以通过与抑郁相关的行为特征(例如控制点、乐观和信任)的差异来解释。总体而言,我们发现抑郁症患者没有更多或更少的冒险倾向。相反,决策背景在很大程度上与我们的理论预期一致。我们通过开发一个概念模型来研究这些模式——由心理学文献提供信息——通过标准跨期选择问题的关键要素(例如,时间偏好、期望、预算限制)将抑郁症与冒险行为联系起来。这激发了中介分析,在该分析中,我们表明冒险行为的差异在很大程度上可以通过与抑郁相关的行为特征(例如控制点、乐观和信任)的差异来解释。总体而言,我们发现抑郁症患者没有更多或更少的冒险倾向。相反,决策背景在很大程度上与我们的理论预期一致。
更新日期:2020-06-10
down
wechat
bug