Recent trends in the labor market-marked by instability and insecurity-have further ignited a discourse on the significance of decent work in people's lives. Scholars have mostly studied the multidimensional decent work construct using the composite scores of the Decent Work Scale (DWS; Duffy et al., 2017). However, there may be different combinations of decent work beyond the simple continuum of composite scores. Thus, we employed latent profile analysis to identify profiles of decent work using the 5 subscales of the DWS as indicators. As a result, 5 different groups with distinct profiles emerged: (a) average, (b) low health care, (c) indecent work, (d) only health care, and (e) decent work. Subsequent analyses comparing each group on demographics (gender, employment, education), theoretical predictors (economic constraints, marginalization, work volition), and theoretical outcomes (job satisfaction, life satisfaction) revealed notable differences across the 5 groups. Implications, limitations, and future directions of the results are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

体面劳动概况：一般趋势和群体差异。

劳动力市场最近的趋势——以不稳定和不安全为标志——进一步引发了关于体面工作在人们生活中的重要性的讨论。学者们大多使用体面劳动量表的综合得分来研究多维体面劳动结构（DWS；Duffy 等，2017）。然而，除了简单的综合分数连续体之外，体面劳动可能还有不同的组合。因此，我们采用潜在概况分析来确定体面劳动概况，使用 DWS 的 5 个子量表作为指标。结果，出现了 5 个具有不同特征的不同群体：(a) 平均，(b) 低医疗保健，(c) 不体面的工作，(d) 仅医疗保健，以及 (e) 体面的工作。随后的分析比较了每个群体的人口统计学（性别、就业、教育）、理论预测因素（经济限制、边缘化、工作意愿）和理论结果（工作满意度、生活满意度）显示 5 组之间存在显着差异。讨论了结果的影响、局限性和未来方向。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。