Abstract This article discusses a neo-Gricean approach to irony, deception and humor developed by Marta Dynel, confronting some of its assumptions and implications with results of experimental research. It is stated that Dynel’s modifications and elaborations of Grice’s original theory of conversation improve its coherence and provide adequate methodological tools for a comprehensive model of irony, deception and humor in multi-party interactions, and also for teasing out subtypes of each of these phenomena. Questions regarding the compatibility of this model with experimental findings concern such issues as the relation of irony and deception to Theory of Mind, and the impact of “humor for humor’s sake” on hearers’ opinions. Although these issues are not addressed in Dynel’s philosophically-oriented framework, they are not necessarily incongruent with her perspective.

中文翻译：

---

新希腊人对讽刺，欺骗和幽默的观点与实验研究的一些见解

摘要本文讨论了Marta Dynel提出的一种新的希腊式讽刺，欺骗和幽默方法，它面对了一些假设和实验研究结果的暗示。有人说，戴纳尔对格赖斯的原始对话理论的修改和阐述提高了其连贯性，并为多党互动中的讽刺，欺骗和幽默的综合模型提供了适当的方法论工具，并为每种现象的子类型调戏。关于该模型与实验结果的兼容性的问题涉及诸如讽刺和欺骗与心理理论的关系以及“幽默为幽默”对听众意见的影响等问题。尽管Dynel的哲学框架未解决这些问题，