In this essay, ethicists grounded in philosophy (Curren) and law (Blokhuis) argue that the US public schools' sponsorship of tackle football is ethically indefensible and inconsistent with their educational aims. Their argument relies on three ethical principles and a growing body of evidence that many students who play football suffer traumatic brain injury and cognitive impairment that undermine their academic success and life prospects, whether or not they suffer concussions. The authors also address educational claims made on behalf of football, the legal principles governing custodial responsibilities of schools and parents, factors that limit the moral and legal significance of children's consent to participate in football programs, and evidence that sponsorship of football programs subjects educational institutions to unsustainable financial risk.

中文翻译：

---

星期五晚上熄灯：学校足球的终结

在本文中，以哲学（Curren）和法律（Blokhuis）为基础的伦理学家认为，美国公立学校赞助足球运动在道德上是无可辩驳的，并且与他们的教育目标背道而驰。他们的论点依赖于三个道德原则和越来越多的证据，表明许多踢足球的学生遭受脑部创伤和认知障碍，无论他们是否遭受脑震荡，都会损害他们的学业成就和生活前景。作者还论述了代表足球提出的教育主张，管理学校和家长的监护责任的法律原则，限制儿童同意参加足球计划的道德和法律意义的因素，