Subjectivity and intersubjectivity have long been recognized as central to the understanding of the relations between language, mind and society. They arise in an interactive world for the mind of the individual and shape his/her (inter)personal reality. In present-day linguistics, there are two major approaches to subjectivity. One is associated with Langacker and focuses on cognitive construal. The other framework, which was developed by Traugott, zooms in on diachronic changes on the conceptual level. Naturally, diachronic developments are intimately related to synchronic variation and the conceptual content of an utterance hinges on its presentation and perspectivization. This paper, therefore, argues that, rather than being discrepant and treating distinct phenomena, as is widely suggested (e.g. Brisard 2006; Nuyts 2001, 2012), the two frameworks can be reconciled. By so doing, the ensuing discussion yields an integrated view on objectivity and (inter)subjectivity, a view that will be organized around four main arguments.

中文翻译：

---

客观性、主观性和主体间性

长期以来，主体性和主体间性被认为是理解语言、思想和社会之间关系的核心。它们出现在个人思想的互动世界中，并塑造他/她（人际）的现实。在当今的语言学中，主体性主要有两种方法。一种与 Langacker 相关，侧重于认知解释。Traugott 开发的另一个框架放大了概念层面的历时变化。自然地，历时发展与共时变化密切相关，话语的概念内容取决于其呈现和视角。因此，本文认为，与其像广泛建议的那样（例如 Brisard 2006；Nuyts 2001, 2012）不同，并处理不同的现象，这两个框架可以调和。通过这样做，随后的讨论产生了关于客观性和（间）主体性的综合观点，该观点将围绕四个主要论点进行组织。