The Propositional Evaluation Paradigm (PEP) has recently shown promise as a relational implicit measure (i.e., an implicit measure which can specify how stimuli are related). Whereas the standard PEP measures response times, mousetracking is becoming increasingly popular for quantifying response competition, with distinct advantages beyond response times. Across four preregistered experiments (N = 737), we interface the utility of the PEP method with the unique benefits of mousetracking by developing a mousetracking PEP (MT-PEP). The MT-PEP very effectively captured group-level beliefs across domains (Experiments 1–4). It produced larger effects (Experiment 3), exhibited superior predictive validity (Experiment 3), and better split-half reliability (Experiments 3–4) than the standard PEP. Both PEPs appear to be intentionally controllable, particularly the MT-PEP (Experiments 3–4). Nevertheless, the MT-PEP shows strong potential in capturing relational information and may be considered implicit in the sense of capturing fast and unaware (but not unintentional) responding.

命题评估范式（PEP）最近已将诺言显示为一种关系隐式测度（即可以指定刺激之间如何关联的隐式测度）。尽管标准PEP可以测量响应时间，但是鼠标跟踪在量化响应竞争方面正变得越来越流行，它具有超越响应时间的独特优势。横跨四个预先注册的实验（N= 737），我们通过开发鼠标跟踪PEP（MT-PEP）将PEP方法的实用程序与鼠标跟踪的独特优势相结合。MT-PEP非常有效地捕获了跨域的组级信念（实验1-4）。与标准PEP相比，它产生了更大的效果（实验3），具有更好的预测效度（实验3）和更好的对分可靠性（实验3-4）。两种PEP似乎都是有意控制的，尤其是MT-PEP（实验3-4）。尽管如此，MT-PEP在捕获关系信息方面显示出强大的潜力，并且在捕获快速而无意识的（但不是无意的）响应的意义上，可以认为是隐式的。