Prior research on various correctional sanctions has sought to explain variation in recidivism. The goal of the current study was to examine whether social disorganization mechanisms, such as residential mobility and family disruption, significantly influenced the recidivism rates of justice-involved individuals supervised under prison diversion programs, traditional community supervision programs, as well as individuals released from prison. Multilevel modeling of justice-involved individuals nested within 25 counties was used to examine the recidivism rates of 2,855 prison diversion cases, 2,278 traditional community supervision cases, and 497 incarceration cases. The results indicated that social disorganization mechanisms, specifically family disruption and residential mobility, significantly influenced the recidivism rates of justice-involved individuals supervised on all three types of correctional sanctions. Therefore, the results indicate that social disorganization mechanisms may partly explain the variation in recidivism rates of justice-involved individuals supervised under various correctional sanctions.

先前对各种惩戒制裁的研究试图解释累犯的变化。本研究的目的是研究诸如居民流动和家庭破裂等社会混乱机制是否对在监狱改道计划，传统社区监督计划以及从监狱释放的个人进行监督的司法介入个人的再犯率产生重大影响。嵌套在25个县内的涉及司法的个人的多级建模用于检验2855例监狱改道案件，2278例传统社区监督案件和497例监禁案件的累犯率。结果表明，社会混乱机制，特别是家庭破坏和居民流动，在所有三种类型的惩戒制裁中受监督的司法人员的累犯率显着影响。因此，结果表明，社会混乱机制可能部分解释了在各种惩戒制裁下受监督的正义者的累犯率的变化。