This research examines the Nice 2 Meet U intervention program which, unlike other programs promoting dialogue between Arab/Palestinian and Jewish students on Israeli campuses, was a grassroots program initiated and moderated by students. The program was designed jointly by the initiators, the participants and the researcher/advisor using action research. The objective of the current study was to describe the negotiations among all the partners with respect to a central dilemma: should the program include political discourse on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? The research proposes seeing the negotiations over designing grassroots conflict intervention programs as an arena in which the participants' academic, ethno-national and gender positions intersect and shape knowledge-power relations. Alongside the risks inherent in this process, it also offers potential for creating transformative spaces that challenge traditional patterns of power relations and encourage students to take part in changing the social atmosphere on campus.

这项研究检查了“ Nice 2 Meet U”干预计划，该计划与其他计划在以色列校园中促进阿拉伯/巴勒斯坦和犹太学生之间的对话的计划不同，它是由学生发起和主持的基层计划。该程序是由发起人，参与者和研究人员/顾问使用行动研究共同设计的。本研究的目的是描述所有合作伙伴之间围绕一个中央困境进行的谈判：该方案是否应包括有关以巴冲突的政治论述？该研究建议将有关设计基层冲突干预计划的谈判视为一个竞技场，参与者的学术，民族，民族和性别立场相交并形成知识－权力关系。除了此过程固有的风险外，