This study examined how dyadic patterns of goal importance during a serial argument interaction predict changes in perceptions of argument resolvability over the course of a specific episode. Seventy romantic couples engaged in a 7‐min discussion of a current serial argument and used a video‐assisted recall method to report their goals at each minute. Although arguers' initial goals did not predict changes in perceptions of resolvability, increases in a partner's endorsement of partner‐identity goals predicted increases in individuals' own perceptions of resolvability. Conversely, increases in a partner's endorsement of self‐identity goals predicted declines in individuals' perceived resolvability. Results suggest that trajectories of identity‐focused goals during serial argument episodes may shape the progress of argument perceptions toward or away from resolvability.

中文翻译：

---

初始目标，目标轨迹以及在串行争论期间感知的可分辨性的变化

这项研究检查了一系列论证互动过程中目标重要性的二进式模式如何预测特定情节过程中对论据可解决性的感知变化。七十对浪漫情侣对当前的连续辩论进行了7分钟的讨论，并使用视频辅助的回忆方法在每分钟报告他们的目标。尽管辩论者的最初目标并未预测可解决性观念的变化，但伴侣对伙伴身份目标的认可的增加预示着个人对可解决性观念的促进。相反，伴侣对自我认同目标的认可增加，则预示着个人可分辨能力的下降。