In previous chapters of Interpreting Kant in Education, a particular set of assumptions about mind and world has been identified for their influence on the familiar ‘Kantian’ picture in education, a picture that receives widespread criticism. In this fourth chapter, various understandings of familiar concepts are again discussed for the purpose of developing a more valuable reading. Continuing with the consideration of ideas about mind and world that underlie different interpretations, this chapter looks at diverse conceptions of world—nature and reality. Kant's Copernican view has been discussed in relation to traditional metaphysics and empiricism; here it is contrasted with naturalist epistemology. Versions of naturalism and materialism are considered, drawing on the work of John McDowell, Sebastian Rödl and David Bakhurst, to draw attention to different ways of conceiving what is real and natural in the world. Discussion is aimed at helping with an understanding of Kant's (non‐traditional) version of idealism.

中文翻译：

---

第四章自然主义，唯物主义与理想世界

在《解读康德教育》的前几章中，已经确定了关于思维和世界的一组特殊假设，因为它们对教育中熟悉的“康德”形象产生了影响，这一形象受到了广泛的批评。在第四章中，再次讨论了对熟悉概念的各种理解，以期开发出更有价值的读物。继续考虑基于心智和世界的思想，这些思想基于不同的解释，本章着眼于世界的各种概念-自然和现实。康德的哥白尼观点已经与传统的形而上学和经验主义有关。这里与自然主义的认识论形成对比。根据约翰·麦克道威尔（John McDowell），塞巴斯蒂安·罗德尔（SebastianRödl）和大卫·巴赫斯特（David Bakhurst）的著作，研究了自然主义和唯物主义的版本，提请人们注意世界上真实和自然事物的不同理解方式。讨论旨在帮助理解康德（非传统）的唯心主义版本。