当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Philosophy of Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Regulating Academic Pressure: From Fast to Slow
Journal of Philosophy of Education ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-07 , DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12493
KAREN FRANÇOIS , KATHLEEN COESSENS , NIGEL VINCKIER , JEAN PAUL VAN BENDEGEM

This paper investigates the impact of publication pressure on the ethics and the scientific integrity in the domain of mathematics and of the arts. Both research fields are specific in their methodology, being that they do not start from a classical hypothesis and researchers in these areas are not knowing what the outcome will be. The research design is open, and creativity is a main part of the research investigation. Both research fields do not rely on empirical cases nor on data collection or data handling. This could be a reason why mathematics and arts seem to be less subject to scientific misconduct. After presenting the (inter)national regulations on ethics and integrity, we will investigate a philosophical analysis in which we consider possible influences from publication pressure that became widespread over all disciplines. We will clarify if and how mathematics and the arts are sensitive to scientific research misconduct or questionable research practices.

中文翻译:

调节学习压力:从快到慢

本文研究了出版压力对数学和艺术领域中伦理和科学完整性的影响。这两个研究领域的方法都是特定的,因为它们不是从经典的假设出发,并且这些领域的研究人员都不知道结果会是什么。研究设计是开放的,创造力是研究调查的主要部分。这两个研究领域都不依赖于经验案例,也不依赖于数据收集或数据处理。这可能是为什么数学和艺术似乎较少受到科学不端行为影响的原因。在提出关于道德与诚信的(国际)国家法规之后,我们将研究一种哲学分析,其中我们考虑了出版压力在所有学科中普遍存在的可能影响。
更新日期:2020-09-07
down
wechat
bug